Back
Azure NC A100 vs Thunder Compute (Aug 2025): Pricing, Billing, and Flexibility Compared
One-page snapshot of how Microsoft Azure’s NC A100 instances stack up against Thunder Compute’s pay-as-you-go A100 80 GB GPUs.
Published:
Aug 1, 2025
Last updated:
Aug 1, 2025

TL;DR
Cost: Thunder Compute is ~4.7 × cheaper per GPU-hour.
Billing: Thunder bills per second; Azure rounds up to whole minutes.
Storage: Thunder persistent volumes start at $0.15/GB/mo; Azure Premium SSD is $0.18/GB/mo.
Ease of use: One-click VS Code workspace, no quota tickets, swap CPU/RAM on the fly.
1. Raw GPU pricing
Provider | SKU | GPUs | On-demand $/hr | Billing granularity | 100 GPU-hr cost |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Azure | 1× A100 80 GB | $3.673 | per-minute (rounded) – see Azure VM pricing FAQ | $367.30 | |
Thunder Compute | A100 80 GB | 1× A100 80 GB | $0.78 | true per-second | $78.00 |
Azure Spot for the same SKU averages $1.145/hr (Vantage), but interruptions revoke your GPU with <30 s notice—unsuitable for fine-tuning runs that aren’t checkpoint-safe.
2. Hidden line items
Cost item | Azure | Thunder Compute |
---|---|---|
Persistent storage | $0.15/GB/mo | |
Snapshots | Incremental snapshots billed separately | Snapshots built-in, same $0.15/GB rate |
Data egress | from US regions $0.087/GB after first 100 GB | First 3 TB per month free, then same $0.087/GB¹ |
¹Thunder matches Azure’s public egress rate only beyond the free tier.
3. Quotas and setup friction
New Azure subscriptions start with 0 N-series vCPUs; you must file a GPU quota increase request.
Availability is region-limited—East US 2 and West Europe frequently show capacity errors.
Thunder Compute accounts spin up instantly with $10 free credit, no GPU quota tickets.
4. Developer experience
Feature | Azure NC A100 | Thunder Compute |
---|---|---|
IDE integration | Use VS Code Remote-SSH or Azure ML Studio | One-click VS Code in browser |
Instance re-sizing | Must redeploy VM; storage detach/attach required | Live RAM, vCPU, and disk tweaks without reboot |
API | Azure Resource Manager | Simple REST & Terraform module |
Pricing transparency | Calculator + separate disk/network pricing | All-in dashboard; per-second metering |
5. When is Azure still a fit?
Multi-GPU scale (>8 A100s) in a single VM via NC96ads A100 v4.
Co-locating with other Azure PaaS services for low-latency data pipelines.
For individual fine-tunes, model inference endpoints, and bursty hackathon workloads, Thunder Compute’s pay-as-you-go model wins on both price and friction.
Conclusion
If you need a single A100 80 GB quickly, Thunder Compute costs $289 less per 100 GPU-hours and bills down to the second. Unless you’re already locked into Azure’s ecosystem or require massive multi-GPU nodes, switching cuts spend and setup time.

Carl Peterson
Other articles you might like
Learn more about how Thunder Compute will virtualize all GPUs
Try Thunder Compute
Start building AI/ML with the world's cheapest GPUs